<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CSS Wizardry &#187; Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csswizardry.com/category/writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csswizardry.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ideas of March</title>
		<link>http://csswizardry.com/2011/03/ideas-of-march/</link>
		<comments>http://csswizardry.com/2011/03/ideas-of-march/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas of March]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csswizardry.com/?p=2667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Shiflett has started something pretty cool&#8212;the Ideas of March movement.
I tend to write quite a lot, but I Tweet a lot more. I love my blog, but sometimes I do, I&#8217;ll admit, get lazy.
I&#8217;ve been on Twitter two years tomorrow (expect a post) but this is why I love blogging:

Blogs expand on important ideas, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Shiflett has started something pretty cool&mdash;the <a href="http://shiflett.org/blog/2011/mar/ideas-of-march"><cite>Ideas of March</cite> movement</a>.</p>
<p>I tend to write quite a lot, but I Tweet a <em>lot</em> more. I love my blog, but sometimes I do, I&#8217;ll admit, get lazy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been on Twitter two years tomorrow (expect a post) but this is why I love blogging:</p>
<ul>
<li>Blogs expand on important ideas, on Twitter the message takes a back seat to the medium.</li>
<li>Blogs give context, a Tweet out of context is a dangerous thing!</li>
<li>You can meter response/popularity of a blog post better than a Tweet.</li>
<li>Blogs are (more) permanent, tweets get buried/lost pretty quickly.</li>
<li>Feedback is admittedly slower with a blog, but more in-depth.</li>
<li>Blogs are editable, updatable and collaborative. Tweets are deleted or superseded, blog posts are updated and discussed.</li>
<li>A blog is <em>your</em> space, you share Twitter with people like Charlie Sheen&#8230;</li>
<li>Tweets are disposable, a good blog post takes time, effort and craft.</li>
<li>With a blog you can concentrate on how good your message is, on Twitter you just concentrate on getting it said in 140 characters.</li>
</ul>
<p>Twitter is an excellent medium, and one to which I owe a lot, but for me Twitter <em>supports</em> this blog. If you write, join <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23ideasofmarch">#ideasofmarch</a> and let&#8217;s start a blog revival.</p>
<h2>Join in</h2>
<p>Join in, it&#8217;s simple!</p>
<ul>
<li>Write a post called Ideas of March.</li>
<li>List some of the reasons you like blogs.</li>
<li>Pledge to blog more the rest of the month.</li>
<li>Share your thoughts on Twitter with the <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23ideasofmarch">#ideasofmarch</a> hashtag.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://csswizardry.com/2011/03/ideas-of-march/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I hate that I love Writer</title>
		<link>http://csswizardry.com/2010/10/i-hate-that-i-love-writer/</link>
		<comments>http://csswizardry.com/2010/10/i-hate-that-i-love-writer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csswizardry.com/?p=1684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I absolutely hate that I love Information Architects&#8217; Writer. Every time I use it I get a little angry inside because I just love it! Weird, I know, but true nonetheless. It&#8217;s just so plain but so great that I get all these funny feelings about it, which always resolves to an envious kind of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="opener"><span>I</span> absolutely</span> hate that I love <a href="http://informationarchitects.jp/">Information Architects</a>&rsquo; <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ia-writer/id392502056?mt=8"><i>Writer</i></a>. Every time I use it I get a little angry inside because I just love it! Weird, I know, but true nonetheless. It&#8217;s just so plain but so great that I get all these funny feelings about it, which always resolves to an envious kind of adoration.</p>
<p>I have followed <a href="http://twitter.com/iA">iA</a> fervently for as long as I&#8217;ve known about them. They are, to me, a beacon of what is good about this industry; they&#8217;re an inspirational agency and one that I love. So, when I heard that they were working on an iPad app I was immediately interested. They&#8217;d set the bar pretty high with their other work, but I had equally high hopes and expectations.</p>
<p>Anyway, the day the app went on sale I bought it. At £2.99 it&#8217;s relatively pricey in app terms, but (as I tend to do more often than not) I reasoned that £3 is less than one pint, so actually pretty reasonable.</p>
<p>I fired it up and saw pretty much nothing, which I guess is the point, but I did feel a little &#8216;Oh, anti-climax&#8230;&#8217; I tinkered with it for a few minutes, idly typing nothings, deleting them, then typing some more. It was pretty mediocre. Or so I thought&#8230;</p>
<p>As I&#8217;d only been typing dummy text I&#8217;d not really used it properly, or to its full potential. I didn&#8217;t see the point, nor did I reap the benefits. That evening, lying in bed, I reached for my iPad and started drafting an article. That&#8217;s when it hit me. Writer is awesome!</p>
<p>When you start using it properly you realise that its stark UI and outward lack of features is a wealth of features in itself. Writer makes writing so easy, and it honestly seems to come more naturally. It&#8217;s a genuine breath of fresh air for anyone who is used to writing on a computer.</p>
<p>I hate word processors with a passion. They&#8217;re horrible, horrible things. On this basis I tend(ed) to draft any articles in my text-editor, <a href="http://notepad-plus-plus.org/">Notepad++</a>. It strips out all the stuff I don&#8217;t need and leaves just me, the canvas and the letters. Oh and all those icons in the UI. And the nastily long line-length. And the awkward look of code-sized type as prose&#8230;</p>
<p>Writer is so amazingly simple, and that&#8217;s why it annoys me. How can something so simple be so fantastic?! It just doesn&#8217;t make sense! I paid almost-a-beer for something that does nothing! Yet it allows me to do everything. I get a little shocked, too, every time I use Writer; I get shocked that each time I open it up I am met with the same sparse interface, and yet the removal of nigh on everything allows me to do whatever I want. It clears the mind and allows the text to just spill onto the &#8216;page&#8217;.</p>
<p>Since buying Writer I have written up every CSS Wizardry article in it. Right now, as I type this, I&#8217;m slouched in my chair, listening to music, sipping a beer and just writing. Writer is the perfect app for the iPad. It&#8217;s using something very comfortable and ergonomic on something very comfortable and ergonomic. Genius.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always said that there are fewer things more complex than making something more simple, yet iA have nailed it. This idea is so simple yet so well executed that I get the oh so familiar &#8216;why didn&#8217;t I think of that?!&#8217;, and <em>this</em> is what annoys me. A huge well-done to Oliver et al. Writer is a masterpiece.</p>
<p>So, if you have an iPad and write a blog, articles, short stories or anything, do yourself a favour and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ia-writer/id392502056?mt=8">buy Writer</a>&mdash;see if it pisses you off too ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://csswizardry.com/2010/10/i-hate-that-i-love-writer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typographic phrases (or: how to turn sayings geeky)</title>
		<link>http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/typographic-phrases-or-how-to-turn-sayings-geeky/</link>
		<comments>http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/typographic-phrases-or-how-to-turn-sayings-geeky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csswizardry.com/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while ago I had the idea to express some old sayings in a silly, geeky way, using code and logic to express logically, the meaning behind some well known phrases. I got Illustrator fired up last night and decided to finally got a few made. They&#8217;re kind of obvious really, even a non-developer brain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="opener"><span>A</span> while</span> ago I had the idea to express some old sayings in a silly, geeky way, using code and logic to express logically, the meaning behind some well known phrases. I got Illustrator fired up last night and decided to finally got a few made. They&#8217;re kind of obvious really, even a non-developer brain can make sense of them, and deciphering the saying is pretty simple, but I think they&#8217;re cool nonetheless.</p>
<h2>Many hands make light work</h2>
<p><img src="http://csswizardry.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/many-hands.jpg" alt="Many hands make light work" width="640" height="452" class="full" /></p>
<p><span id="more-780"></span></p>
<p>There are lots of contradictions in sayings and phrases. Like this one, if many hands do make light work, then how does this next one work?</p>
<h2>Too many cooks spoil the broth</h2>
<p><img src="http://csswizardry.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/too-many-cooks.jpg" alt="Too many cooks spoil the broth" width="640" height="452" class="full" /></p>
<h2>A stitch in time&#8230;</h2>
<p><img src="http://csswizardry.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/a-stitch-in-time.jpg" alt="A stitch in time saves nine" width="640" height="452" class="full" /></p>
<h2>While the cat is away&#8230;</h2>
<p><img src="http://csswizardry.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/while-the-cat-is-away.jpg" alt="While the cat is away the mice will play" width="640" height="452" class="full" /></p>
<h2>Absence makes the heart grow fonder vs. time is a great healer</h2>
<p><img src="http://csswizardry.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/absence.jpg" alt="Absence makes the heart grow fonder vs. time is a great healer" width="640" height="452" class="full" /></p>
<p>This one is another glaring contradiction, so I decided to combine the two into one poster.</p>
<h2>Out of sight, out of mind</h2>
<p><img src="http://csswizardry.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/out-of-sight.jpg" alt="Out of sight, out of mind" width="640" height="452" class="full" /></p>
<h2>Two wrongs don&#8217;t make a right</h2>
<p>This one doesn&#8217;t really follow the code paradigm, but I thought I&#8217;d include it anyway.</p>
<p><img src="http://csswizardry.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/two-wrongs.jpg" alt="Two wrongs don&#039;t make a right" width="640" height="452" class="full" /></p>
<p>Got any more that would work in this way? Leave any suggestions in the comments.</p>
<p>Also, I do realise that, programmatically, not all of these posters make perfect sense. For example, <code>$cooks > 'enough'</code> doesn&#8217;t really work in a programming sense&#8230; It&#8217;s just a bit of fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/typographic-phrases-or-how-to-turn-sayings-geeky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The importance of proper punctuation</title>
		<link>http://csswizardry.com/2010/01/the-importance-of-proper-punctuation/</link>
		<comments>http://csswizardry.com/2010/01/the-importance-of-proper-punctuation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punctuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csswizardry.com/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a short (and cheeky) post on the necessity of using proper punctuation&#8212;particularly the hyphen&#8212;and how it can completely alter the meaning of your sentence, often with ill effect. This morning, for one reason or another, I was reminded of a conversation I had with @nofunnyname last week on the subject of him buying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="opener"><span>T</span>his</span> is a short (and cheeky) post on the necessity of using proper punctuation&mdash;particularly the hyphen&mdash;and how it can completely alter the meaning of your sentence, often with ill effect. This morning, for one reason or another, I was reminded of a conversation I had with <a href="http://twitter.com/nofunnyname" title="Dan Metcalfe on Twitter">@nofunnyname</a> last week on the subject of him buying a car. He said:</p>
<blockquote><p>&ldquo;I need to get an old ass banger.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So, is that <q>&#8216;old-ass banger&#8217;</q>, or <q>&#8216;old ass-banger&#8217;</q>? You decide ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://csswizardry.com/2010/01/the-importance-of-proper-punctuation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

