<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple column lists using one &lt;ul&gt;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/mutiple-column-lists-using-one-ul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/mutiple-column-lists-using-one-ul/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:55:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hudson</title>
		<link>http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/mutiple-column-lists-using-one-ul/comment-page-1/#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csswizardry.com/?p=701#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>This is so simple, so perfect!

I&#039;m looking to do this with nested uls, preferably without using negative margins to keep the left side flush.

Any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so simple, so perfect!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking to do this with nested uls, preferably without using negative margins to keep the left side flush.</p>
<p>Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burton Haynes</title>
		<link>http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/mutiple-column-lists-using-one-ul/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Burton Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csswizardry.com/?p=701#comment-598</guid>
		<description>I am a huge fan of everything related to typography, keep up the good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge fan of everything related to typography, keep up the good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viktor</title>
		<link>http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/mutiple-column-lists-using-one-ul/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>viktor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csswizardry.com/?p=701#comment-441</guid>
		<description>http://www.csshrou.sk/x-stlpcovy-zoznam-s-jedinym-olul-tagom/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.csshrou.sk/x-stlpcovy-zoznam-s-jedinym-olul-tagom/" rel="nofollow">http://www.csshrou.sk/x-stlpcovy-zoznam-s-jedinym-olul-tagom/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrzej O.</title>
		<link>http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/mutiple-column-lists-using-one-ul/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrzej O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csswizardry.com/?p=701#comment-440</guid>
		<description>This is so simple that I never thought that someone may not know that :-)

But if you want to put tabelar data then you should use tables if you prefer to be semantic in 100%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so simple that I never thought that someone may not know that :-)</p>
<p>But if you want to put tabelar data then you should use tables if you prefer to be semantic in 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Roberts</title>
		<link>http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/mutiple-column-lists-using-one-ul/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csswizardry.com/?p=701#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Hi Brett,
I&#039;d sincerely recommend against using lists to layout tables, as per http://csswizardry.com/2009/12/typographic-work-planner/comment-page-1/#comment-30

Harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brett,<br />
I&#8217;d sincerely recommend against using lists to layout tables, as per <a href="http://csswizardry.com/2009/12/typographic-work-planner/comment-page-1/#comment-30" rel="nofollow">http://csswizardry.com/2009/12/typographic-work-planner/comment-page-1/#comment-30</a></p>
<p>Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://csswizardry.com/2010/02/mutiple-column-lists-using-one-ul/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csswizardry.com/?p=701#comment-430</guid>
		<description>thank you,
i&#039;d been thinking that there must be a way to show tables in a simpler way....but could never find the way out....

the markup with ul li is better than using tables and i&#039;d implement it hence forth in my web dev. projects for simple tables....

thanks a lot
regards,
brett a.k.a. bharat khiani (freelance web developer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you,<br />
i&#8217;d been thinking that there must be a way to show tables in a simpler way&#8230;.but could never find the way out&#8230;.</p>
<p>the markup with ul li is better than using tables and i&#8217;d implement it hence forth in my web dev. projects for simple tables&#8230;.</p>
<p>thanks a lot<br />
regards,<br />
brett a.k.a. bharat khiani (freelance web developer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
